We previously reported about the $7.7 Million verdict won by former "Price is Right" Model, Brandi Cochran, in her pregnancy discrimination lawsuit. (See http://themploymentlaw.blogspot.com/2012/12/price-is-right-model-wins-77-mil-in.html) However, according to the Hollywood Reporter (see link below), that $7.7
Million verdict in favor of Ms. Cochran, has been set aside, and a new trial ordered.
After Cochran won her trial, the California Supreme Court
made a decision about jury instructions in a mixed motive discrimination case.
In Harris v. City of Santa Monica, No. S181004 (Cal. Feb. 7, 2013), the Supreme
Court held that to establish liability in “mixed motive” employment
discrimination cases under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act
(FEHA), the employee must show that unlawful discrimination was a substantial
factor motivating the adverse employment decision. Thus, per Harris, Judges
need to instruct the jury that discrimination is not just a "motivating
factor/reason" for termination but a "substantial motivation
factor/reason."
In the Cochran case, Judge Kevin Brazile failed to issue this
"substantial" guidance despite a request from the defendants. Judge Brazile was then asked by the defense to set aside the verdict and dismiss the case. Judge Brazile rejected this argument, noting
that "the evidence established that
Defendants discriminated against Plaintiff, terminating her on the grounds of
her prior pregnancy and complications ... the evidence is sufficient to support
the verdict." However, given the decision in Harris, Judge Brazile said
the "instruction error cannot be considered harmless," and was
compelled to grant a new trial.
[Hollywood Reporter link: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/price-is-right-models-77-428148]